mooi spul mooie draad.
Al heeft de Mirage me nooit zo aangesproken.
ik heb een mirage rack ,..eerlijk gezegd nog maar bitter weinig in gebruik ...shame iknow...
iig ik had m gekocht om mee samplen en m dan goede maatjes te laten worden met mn oberheim dpx
http://www.emulatorarchive.com/Samplers/DPX1Overview/dpx1overview.html
op een paar floppys na ,..nog niet veel meegedaan
dusk ben wel beniewd ...naar reacties van mensen die m al jaren gebruiken ,t waarom - wat ze er ongeveer mee doen ,...
vast geen harddisk recording
maar bv drums ofso en filteren ze die ...og gewoon staright 8 bitt ..eruit
want er zijn vast wel mirage gebruikers groepen ..on line ...ergens
maar om eerst lid te worden
en dan mee te moge discussen over hoe schandalig fettje die wel niet is ,..tsja ,..t gaat mij voornamelijk dat iksamples kan maken die mn dpx dan heerlijk na played ....voor wie niet weet , de dpx is een emu emulator 2 board in oberheim jasje
dus de mirage sound en prophet 2000 en de s900 sound uit een kastje ,..mooi geen moulinex,...
check
http://www.i2.i-2000.com/~jeffrey/DPX1.htm
Conclusion
The DPX-1 is a sample player with the ability to read samples of the following formats: Emu Systems Emulator II, Sequential Prophet 2000/2, Ensoniq Mirage and Akai S900. The S900 samples may only be read with units that have ROM version 2.0 or later. The unit is strictly a sample player with no ability to sample or modify the presets which are loaded into the unit.
The Voice
The DPX is an eight voice polyphonic instrument which converts all sample data to 12 bit linear data format. The DPX-1 uses a Motorola 68000 processor to perform this function among other things. The voice is routed trough a VCF and VCA and maybe modulated by an LFO. The samples are loaded via a 3.5 double density or 5 ¼ disk drive. All VCF, VCA and LFO parameters are read from disk and are not editable by the user with the exception of Filter Cutoff. With ROM 2.0 or later the filter cutoff may be adjusted from 0-99, while earlier versions allow the user to select filter wide open or the filter setting per the disk.
The DPX-1 is a great idea with one serious flaw which is the inability to edit presets. Its a shame that the Sound Designer I special versions (i.e. Emulator II or Prophet 2000) was never created to work with the DPX-1. The DPX’s usefulness is seriously limited unless you already have sample banks that are set up exactly as you wish to use them. However the DPX-1 is a excellent way to add 8 voices of EII, Mirage, P2000 and S900. It is cheaper that buying one of these samplers and you get the ability to read all four formats. I can only do a side by side comparison of the EII to the DPX with respect to how it sounds. The EII seems a little smoother sounding to me especially its filter. However the sound difference is very minimal but there is going to be a difference with the EII and the DPX since the DPX plays backs samples using linear 12 bit versus non-linear 8 bit on the Emulator II. I also think the filter is more aggressive sounding in the DPX-1 than the EII. So my preference is the EII over the DPX when it comes to the sound but the difference is very slight. The real advantages of the DPX is its price, its size (there was no Emulator II rack), the ability to get EII preset banks on 3.5 disk and most importantly the ability to read 4 different sample formats.
mijn bydrage aan t ensoniq mirage verhaal,... hy staat vaak ,...en de asrx ..ook -soms een drumkitje aan sturen ,..eiegnlijk zonde ,-
iemand kopen '?
kwilde 400 mag weg voor 350 ,...zie verkoop draad
leuke -mooie sampler met eiegnlijkalles erop ,..
kheb centen nodig voor een z1-k5000 ofso